Imagine
this: You are required to address a group that includes “Applications-first”
and “Principles-first” people. Applications-first reasoning allows conclusions to
be reached after reviewing empirical observations whereas principles-first reasoning
requires that conclusions or facts be derived from principles and concepts.
Generally the
educational background of an individual, which is determined by the kind of
curriculum that is in force in one’s country of study, determines which
approach such an individual favours. Schools in countries like the U.S.,
Canada, and the UK usually focus more on how to apply a tool and spend less
time explaining principles and concepts (Applications-first). In contrast, schools
in countries like Spain, Nigeria, Germany, and in Latin America tend to spend more
time teaching general principles and less time on how to apply those principles
(Principles-first).
Most often
than not, we don’t have the liberty of choosing the preferred approach of our
audience. This mix is very likely in the wake of globalization. Our audiences
tend to be as diverse as possible. Leaders need to be able to engage their
target audience if they hope to get anything moving.
The best
approach has been determined to be alternating between principles and examples.
Introduce a principle THEN give some practical examples. Then, go on to the
next principle and give examples. Many people love stories because they have
elements of both in
It is also
important to read the mood of your audience so you don’t bore them. You need
them awake to remember your key points. If you have the luxury of time, you can
allow them ask questions but be careful not to go off-topic. My personal
preference is to ask the participants to note down their questions. Periodically,
I pause and answer questions. You can also ask them to wait till after the
presentation, if it isn’t a long one.
You need to
display some emotional intelligence with your audience. Once, I was training
some young engineers and I observed that one of them was not smiling at any of
my wisecracks. I know I sometimes crack dry jokes but I knew it wasn’t the case
in this instance. I had to ask him what the matter was. It turned out that he
wasn’t feeling well. I had to ask him to take care of himself and come back the
next day. I also spent some time discussing “off-topic” points (which I later
related to some points in the presentation) when I observed that my audience
were getting tired with engineering details.
The best
presentations merge facts with practical examples. Think of any
sermon/presentation/articles you ever listened to or read: they have a good mix
of both.
So, what
are you going to do about your next presentation? Will you pack in so many
facts and leave out the fun part? Will you keep the fun and leave your audience
with no principles to take away? Or will you find the right balance between
facts and fun?
Please feel
free to share your views and comments. Have a blessed and productive day.
No comments:
Post a Comment